Employment Testing and Human Resource Management Article

Work Testing and Human Resource Management - Article Example The specialist expresses that while Ajila and Okafor give a nitty gritty and instructive record of business testing, the importance of such testing in Human Resource Management is given just shallow treatment. Ajila and Okafor characterize Human Resources Management, its target in coordinating authoritative objectives with worker aptitudes, and the utilization of business testing as a stage in any â€Å"comprehensive screening program†. The creators present an inside and out record of the cause and nature of business testing, starting with its underlying foundations in the trial of Francis Galton in 1883, and its development throughout the decades: from Alfred Binet’s scales, the Stanford-Binet test, and the Army Tests utilized in World War I. Ajila and Okafor proceed to characterize mental tests, and dissect business testing as far as legitimacy and dependability. As staff choice is one of the most critical highlights of Human Resource Management, the creators investig ate legitimacy (exactness, authenticity) and unwavering quality (reliability or consistency) regarding measures used to survey the â€Å"attributes identified with progress on the job†. The creators give a far reaching report of the different sorts of tests utilized in staff screening and determination, in light of psychological capacity, mechanical capacity, engine and tangible capacity, inclination, character, and information. By giving instances of every sort of test, the creators further clarify the idea of business testing and the reason and utilization of the various tests. Ajila and Okafor close with the unequivocal statement that business testing should be a piece of the procedure of faculty choice. While the writers give an admirably itemized examination of the historical backdrop of mental testing, and a thorough rundown of the sorts of tests, the article doesn't make a sufficient case for the incorporation of such testing in the work force choice procedure. Ajila a nd Okafor don't cite any investigations or examination to back their stand that work testing is a solid and legitimate strategy for staff determination.