Canadian business law case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Canadian business law - Case Study Exampleof Chip operates on an equal bargaining power as the Axel company receiving his services (Government of Canada, 2014).Therefore, his new terms of act calls for autonomous management of his own affairs and complete independence in the execution of his duties as appoint by the company (Primerus, 2014).The Canadian Ministry of Labor provides policy guidelines for managing the aspects of independent contractors. The ministry, while offering protection for the rights of both employees and independent contractors, outrightly describes Chips situation differently. He ceased to have entitlement to benefits accruing to the companys employees. From a critical viewpoint, Chip is no longer Axels employee, meaning that he does not have to be answerable to the company. He has no employment rights enshrined in the ESA as he had before going the independence way.Furthermore, he has no entitlement to equal treatment as opposite employees working under Axel . While coming to this new contract, Chip had made all considerations and come to a sober and an informed decision thereby forego all related employee benefits. Against the legal obligations of the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA), Chip faces two conflicting scenarios he has fraudulently evaded tax and premium compliance by not informing the Workers Compensation scheme of the current changes in his work contract. According to the obligations of the CRA, Chip ought to commence remitting his own revenue billings, an obligation that he break by not informing the relevant authorities of the changes in work contract. Moreover, no workplace insurance premiums get billed on the work as done by Chip. This scenario means that he fraudulently remains a beneficiary of the Axels employee schemes against the requirements besides signing a different work contract.As he drove out of Axels premises, Chips mandate was independent of Axels. He was absolutely out of duty as per the new work contract su ch that his